In November 1998, the Subcommittee on Transportation Research and Development (R&D)
of the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) released the first Federal Transportation
Technology Plan. This plan presents initial implementation strategies for the
private-public partnerships identified in the 1997 NSTC Transportation Science and
Technology Strategy. Among these partnerships, that on "Enhanced Goods and
Freight Movement at Domestic and International Gateways" addresses the need for more
flexible, efficient, and seamless freight transportation systems. The partnership has
three key goals: (1) improve freight mobility at land borders and ports; (2) ensure the
diffusion of freight information technologies and networks; and (3) expedite the global
flow of goods.
The gateways partnership promotes an integrated freight R&D and investment policy
and private-public collaboration on large-scale investment projects. This strategic plan
outlines the partnerships outcome goals, investment strategies, and anticipated
impacts for ports and intermodal terminals. Together with a companion document for border
gateways, this plan provides a framework for a comprehensive R&D investment strategy
for freight transportation.
Opportunities and Challenges
The U.S. economy has benefited from the surge in global trade in three ways: (1) the
growth in national income; (2) the emergence of new markets; and (3) the decline in the
cost of goods. Furthermore, global outsourcing has intensified the economic gains from
trade and fostered greater demand for innovative freight technologies.
Yet, this increase in trade also creates significant challenges. Threats to the
transportation systems ability to meet the needs of trading partners warrant a
strong Federal role in promoting a technology-intensive freight infrastructure. These
threats include:
Port facilities inability to meet the demands of containerships for better port
access and on-dock container handling.
Capacity constraints that hamper railroads and other intermodal carriers
abilities to meet the growing demand for container shipments while responding to
intensified pressures to cut costs.
The spiraling costs of financing modern, large-scale, multi-jurisdictional freight
facilities.
The increasing complexity of emerging technologies, including the need to establish
standards for interoperability.
Outcome Goals
This partnership promotes national goals for economic growth and trade competitiveness
by achieving four key outcome goals. These outcome goals, along with investment
strategies, anticipated impacts, and critical elements, are as follows:
Outcome Goal 1: Ensure adequate throughput and intermodal capacity at the Nations
ports and other intermodal freight facilities.
Investment Strategy: Partner with State, local, and private agencies; port
authorities; and intermodal service providers to improve network capacity by deploying
advanced technologies that increase gate throughput, expedite cargo and container
clearance time, and enhance navigation efficiency and information transparency at ports
and intermodal facilities.
Impacts: Reduced operating costs, increased door-to-door cargo delivery speeds, and
improved service.
Critical Elements: Automatic equipment identification, Global Positioning System
location identification devices, and positive train control.
Outcome Goal 2: Promote advanced multi-modal terminals and consolidated cargo- handling
hubs and feeder facilities.
Investment Strategy: Partner with State and local agencies and private carriers to
leverage investment in multi-beneficiary intermodal terminals and freight corridors
through mechanisms for cost-sharing and pooling resources.
Impacts: Reduced operating costs and congestion through economies of scale allowing
the consolidation of large volumes of cargo in a single facility.
Critical Elements: Real-time supply-chain management systems and innovative
financing mechanisms.
Outcome Goal 3: Support the development and diffusion of next-generation freight
transportation technologies.
Investment Strategy: Accelerate the diffusion of existing marine, rail, and
dual-use defense technologies through outreach and training efforts that make the
technologies readily available to a larger group of users.
Impacts: Enhanced safety, efficiency, and capacity, with subsequent spillover
benefits through growth in national income and productivity.
Critical Elements: Bi-modal rail equipment (such as the Iron Highway) and
innovative container-handling devices.
Outcome Goal 4: Support interagency efforts to coordinate the development of standard
technology protocols, shared information systems, and joint-use military facilities.
Investment Strategy: Provide Federal leadership to develop standard protocols for
technology applications, remove institutional barriers to joint use of defense
technologies, and formulate interagency strategies to arrive at a globally optimal freight
network.
Impacts: More efficient resource use, cost-cutting opportunities for the freight
industry, and economic growth through greater diffusion of dual-use technologies.
Critical Elements: Shared information and databases, including a one-stop shopping
process for all Federal clearance permits required for international cargo.
Implementation
This partnership relies on a three-pronged strategy for implementation: (1) technology
development; (2) technology deployment and diffusion; and (3) technology dissemination and
outreach.
Technology development involves the identification of enabling technologies that
enhance the management of existing resources and generate the greatest benefits for
end-users, such as local freight investment planning agencies and small- and medium-sized
carriers and shippers.
Technology deployment efforts promote technology applications at terminals and
freight facilities through the identification of incentive grants and opportunities for
strategic alliances.
Finally, technology dissemination involves the development of a clearinghouse
for information on industry best practices and the identification of areas where Federal
leadership is needed to overcome institutional barriers to innovation, for example, the
establishment of standards or joint use of military facilities.
Return to Top
Next Section